ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Venomous snakebites are a common clinical scenario in the Southeastern United States. CroFab® (Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab (Ovine), BTG, Wales, UK) antivenom is indicated in cases involving pit vipers and is known to be expensive. The treatment protocol for snakebites is based on clinically subjective measures triggering the application, or escalation of, antivenom administration. The purpose of this study is to characterize the use of CroFab at our institution and to evaluate the impact of its use regarding cost and overall outcomes. We suspect that it is often used but potentially less often needed. We hypothesized that CroFab use was associated with increased length of stay (LOS) without an observed difference in patient outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of snakebite patients at our level-1 trauma center from 2000 to 2016 was performed. Snakebite location, snake species, number of vials of CroFab administered, hospital LOS, intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, and complications were identified for each patient. Patients were divided into CroFab (C) and no CroFab (NC) groups. RESULTS: One hundred ninety patients with venomous snakebites were included. 53.7% of patients received CroFab. There was no difference in the complication rate of C versus NC groups, (P = .1118). CroFab use was associated with longer hospital LOS (P < .0001) and ICU LOS (P < .0001). DISCUSSION: CroFab use was associated with increased LOS in our patient population. There was no difference in observed outcomes between the C and NC groups. These findings imply that CroFab is potentially over-used in our patient population.
